![]() |
| CCRL denounces SCC decision in marriage reference |
TORONTO, Dec. 9, 2004 – The In their non-binding ruling on the government’s reference questions, the justices ruled that Parliament, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, has the exclusive legislative authority to change the definition of marriage to include same sex couples, that to do so would be consistent with the Charter of Rights and Freedom, and that religious leaders are protected from having to marry same sex couples. The court declined to rule on a fourth question, whether the traditional definition of marriage being between a man and a woman is constitutional. “The court should have returned the reference questions to Parliament for the proper stages of the introduction and debate of a bill before they gave an opinion,” notes “However, Parliament still must introduce and debate this legislation before it becomes law. We will be working with all Canadians who value true marriage to defeat any legislation in favour of same sex marriage every step of the way. The decision must now be made by the public and their elected officials, not the courts. We want MPs to know that they will be held accountable.” “In particular, Prime Minister Paul Martin and Justice Minister Irwin Cotler are obliged to have a truly free vote on this legislation, and must call off their whips in caucus and cabinet. Members of Parliament should not have their consciences stifled on this most fundamental issue. It is abhorent to think that members elected by constituents precisely due to their expressed views on same sex marriage should bracket those views or check their consciences at the door of the House Commons. The true test of religious and conscientious freedom in About CCRL For further information:
|